Until recently, I had never really been exposed to YouTube, and thus knew nothing about the conventions or regulations of this site. I was entering it as would any other newcomer and so I searched for something that would tell me the rules, something that would give me a feeling for the norms of this particular website. So with a little navigation and investigation I hunted down the “Leviathan of the YouTube community,” as I have nominated it.
I was not surprised to find a written “code of conduct,” representative of what Wallace describes as the “sign on the door.” This guide is written extremely informally which becomes very clear in their first statement. “We're not asking for the kind of respect reserved for nuns, the elderly, and brain surgeons.” It appears that they had a great time writing this list of rules with intermittent jokes, which Wallace illustrates is very common among websites now, especially in areas like a code of conduct or Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ). Their focus was on the concept of trust. They remind users that there is only so much they can do, so in essence, be trustworthy when using their site. The code of conduct then illustrates how they will review videos that have been “flagged as inappropriate,” which any user has the power to do, and then they will decide if the video should be removed.
The final section of the “code of conduct,” and that which I think is the most important is entitled “YouTube is for the community.” We can tell people hundreds of times that they should not post inappropriate videos, but there is no saying they will abide. However, I do think that reminding people that this is a group, a cohesive unit of people that are taking a risk and putting themselves out there for the entire world to see, is an extremely vital feature of the internet community. Put simply, don’t take advantage of others’ vulnerability and do respect the norms of this community that people have come to have faith in it. According to Wallace, the internet community is so vast and filled with so many different types of people that sometimes rules need to be written out as in the “sign on the door.” However, Wallace also demonstrates the key concept that most of what we refer to as the Leviathan actually comes from within ourselves. To preserve these groups that we want so much to be a part of, we will conform to the conventions that they put forth. Though “signs on the door” may be a part of it, we ultimately have an innately human need to fit in and to conform to the norms that society puts forth for us, whether they are explicitly written out on a wall or something we learn simply by time spent in a certain society, such as that of the YouTube.
YouTube is definitely a special case when it comes to the development of trust because some people are truly putting their heart and soul into these videos. They are not simply selling something on e-bay or writing a blog post, but putting up videos of their friends, families, and other things that may be extremely important to them. For this reason, YouTube does have a team to write up a code of conduct and to inspect any inappropriate videos, but it really comes down on us, the users of the site. Not everyone will read this “sign on the door” and not everyone will respect the rules and norms put forth by the team. People will still write terrible things in response to someone’s video, completely bashing their views on the world and everything they put into making it. However, for this site to be the successful place for sharing and communicating that it is, the Leviathan could not simply come from a “sign on the door,” but rather from the users themselves. Since the users of YouTube want the website to perpetuate through time, they will have enough reason to maintain a mutual respect for the norms set forth by the YouTube community.
3 comments:
Hi Randi,
Using YOUTube was a great example for finding the Leviathan. I agree that since the scope of YOUTube is so vast (it shocks me how many videos are uploaded there per hour), it is impossible for a true Leviathan to moderate the content, leading the judgment mainly up to viewers.
Rarely have I come across a video on Youtube that is inappropriate without it being warned as so (you are asked to confirm your birthdate so that you are age appropriate to view the video). However, I have often times found the comments to be crude, degrading and insensitive. I think mainly since people can view others in terms of physical appearance, behavior, as well as talents (singing and dancing in particular) in the videos, they can conform less to the norm and be more critical than they would in reality. In this way, I think people conform less to the norm, and use their anonymity and the vulnerability of the user who put their video up to become more radical and critical in their views.
Hey Randi,
You found a great example of a leviathan here, and tied it extraordinarily well to Wallace's concepts, such as the "sign on the door." You correctly identified the role feedback from other users plays in such a large online space in moderating conduct with your discussion of flagging inappropriate videos, and you provided a wonderful analysis of users motivation to comply with the social norms of the site (the code of conduct). Overall this was a very well done post and I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.
Hey, I'm Brendan Suhrland. You brought up some great points about the Leviathan's role on YouTube. What you said about mutual respect in terms of the comments people leave is a great example of our willingness to conform. Everyone wants YouTube to continue to be the great source for all kinds of video clips, so we conform to the idea of what is acceptable feedback for a video.
I think it's also interesting to note that the Leviathan has a new tool on YouTube: voting for comments. Basically, you can give someone else's comment a positive or negative vote, and if a comment gets enough negative votes, it will not automatically be displayed anymore. So instead of people conforming by what they write, they can now also force others to accept a sort of conformation.
Post a Comment